baanna.blogg.se

People love to shop well known brands and if Victoria Secret added plus, I’m willing to put a little money on it and bet that they would’ve done astronomical sales within a year. Support Plus Size Brands That Support You

READ THIS: Gabifresh launches new Playful Promises Collection In addition, we have more prominent plus size models now than back in 2000. With the body positive and size inclusive movements being so influential and successful you would think they would’ve tried to incorporate plus sizes. The plus size market is a multi-billion dollar business. By now, you would think the label would offer plus sizes. Their panty size range ends at an XL.Ĭurrently, the average U.S. When other lingerie retailers go up to at least an H cup and larger. The fact that their bras only go up to a DDD is mind boggling. largest lingerie label for so long, I think the brand has made little to no efforts to change with the times. Personally, I’m not surprised at their declining sales. In a Forbes article, it was reported that the retail chain has been seeing declining sales since 2016. It’s no secret that Victoria’s Secret is not doing well. Unfortunately, many brands feel this way and don’t care about the backlash.

He also said they still don’t have any interest.Įd Razek tried to apologize for his comments but no one was trying to hear it. He said they thought about it and tried to do a show back in 2000 and no one had any interest. Razek said the “shows were a fantasy and should not include transsexuals.” He was also asked have they thought about including plus size models. They asked him if Victoria’s Secret would include plus size models and trans models. Vogue interviewed marketing director Ed Razek. Why You Shouldn’t Support Victoria’s Secret It’s okay because there are some amazing plus size lingerie brands that are proud to design for plus size women. It would have been a game changing move for them if they did. People were calling for the brand to feature plus size models and transgender models. The mega lingerie retailer was blasted for their lack of diversity in their runway shows. "We get it, we’re enormously successful and have been for a very long time.Victoria’s Secret has been under fire for the past year. "Nonsense gets written about us God bless, we understand, we’re a big target, a very big target," he concluded. And they carp at us because we’re the leader." It is the only one of its kind in the world and any other fashion brand in the world would take it in a minute, including the competitors that are carping at us. "Well, why not? Because the show is a fantasy. No, I don’t think we should," said Razek. "It’s like, why doesn’t your show do this? Shouldn’t you have transsexuals in the show? No. No one is critiquing the VS show for its failure to feature pregnant models (Irina Shayk, Alessandra Ambrosio and Lily Aldridge have all done so, albeit in the early stages of pregnancy with their bumps covered up - although this could have been a personal choice rather than an instruction from the brand), but rather its limited view of what it means to be beautiful.īy the sounds of it, Razek has no plans to change his formula anytime soon, writing off any criticism to jealousy. A pregnant Irina Shayk in the 2017 Victoria’s Secret show Getty